<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How dense are you?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lammo.net/seo-link-building/257/how-dense-are-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lammo.net/seo-link-building/257/how-dense-are-you/</link>
	<description>Wealth creation through Internet Marketing and Investing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 23:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel longieliere</title>
		<link>http://www.lammo.net/seo-link-building/257/how-dense-are-you/comment-page-1/#comment-5207</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel longieliere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lammo.net/?p=257#comment-5207</guid>
		<description>Let me also point out that keywords closer to the top of the page have a larger weight to seo.  Also I noticed that before I even used meta tags google was very good at picking out my keywords based on bolding and density.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me also point out that keywords closer to the top of the page have a larger weight to seo.  Also I noticed that before I even used meta tags google was very good at picking out my keywords based on bolding and density.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lammo</title>
		<link>http://www.lammo.net/seo-link-building/257/how-dense-are-you/comment-page-1/#comment-5179</link>
		<dc:creator>Lammo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lammo.net/?p=257#comment-5179</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I think keyword density is one of the more basic ranking methods that won&#039;t have as much weight as it would have done 10 years ago - I much prefer to write for a human than a search engine, as it&#039;s much more natural - still annoys me when I see sites over-using their &quot;target&quot; keywords 20 or 30 times on a page!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I think keyword density is one of the more basic ranking methods that won&#8217;t have as much weight as it would have done 10 years ago &#8211; I much prefer to write for a human than a search engine, as it&#8217;s much more natural &#8211; still annoys me when I see sites over-using their &#8220;target&#8221; keywords 20 or 30 times on a page!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BLOGERCISE</title>
		<link>http://www.lammo.net/seo-link-building/257/how-dense-are-you/comment-page-1/#comment-5176</link>
		<dc:creator>BLOGERCISE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lammo.net/?p=257#comment-5176</guid>
		<description>It is often said that Google for one have done away with this model, and are now very good at looking at keyword proximity and semantic terms.  The keyword density model is simplistic and, like you say, can be manipulated.  I don&#039;t know if anyone knows for sure but this would make sense to me, it was (or will be) only a matter of time before they reached a level of sophistication beyond calculating a density value.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is often said that Google for one have done away with this model, and are now very good at looking at keyword proximity and semantic terms.  The keyword density model is simplistic and, like you say, can be manipulated.  I don&#8217;t know if anyone knows for sure but this would make sense to me, it was (or will be) only a matter of time before they reached a level of sophistication beyond calculating a density value.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

